Abstract
Knowledge ascriptions are contrast-sensitive. One natural explanation for this is that the knowledge relation is contrastive (s knows that p rather than q). But can the binary view of knowledge (s knows that p) explain contrast-sensitivity? I review some of the linguistic data supporting contrast-sensitivity, and critique the three main binary explanations for contrast-sensitivity. I conclude that the contrast-sensitivity of knowledge ascriptions shows that knowledge is a contrastive relation.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 235-245 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Social Epistemology |
Volume | 22 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jul 2008 |