Abstract
Knowledge ascriptions are contrast-sensitive. One natural explanation for this is that the knowledge relation is contrastive (s knows that p rather than q). But can the binary view of knowledge (s knows that p) explain contrast-sensitivity? I review some of the linguistic data supporting contrast-sensitivity, and critique the three main binary explanations for contrast-sensitivity. I conclude that the contrast-sensitivity of knowledge ascriptions shows that knowledge is a contrastive relation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 235-245 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Social Epistemology |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jul 2008 |
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver