The COSMOS-[O II] survey: Evolution of electron density with star formation rate

Melanie Kaasinen, Fuyan Bian, Brent Groves, Lisa J. Kewley, Anshu Gupta

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    65 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Star-forming galaxies at z > 1 exhibit significantly different properties to local galaxies of equivalent stellar mass. Not only are high-redshift star-forming galaxies characterized by higher star formation rates and gas fractions than their local counterparts, they also appear to host star-forming regions with significantly different physical conditions, including greater electron densities. To understand what physical mechanisms are responsible for the observed evolution of the star-forming conditions, we have assembled the largest sample of star-forming galaxies at z ~ 1.5 with emission-line measurements of the [O II]λλ3726, 3729 doublet. By comparing our z ~ 1.5 sample to local galaxy samples with equivalent distributions of stellar mass, star formation rate and specific star formation rate we investigate the proposed evolution in electron density and its dependence on global properties. We measure an average electron density of 114-27+28 cm-3 for our z ~ 1.5 sample, a factor of 5 greater than the typical electron density of local star-forming galaxies. However, we find no offset between the typical electron densities of local and high-redshift galaxies with equivalent star formation rates. Our work indicates that the average electron density of a sample is highly sensitive to the star formation rates, implying that the previously observed evolution is mainly the result of selection effects.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)3220-3234
    Number of pages15
    JournalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
    Volume465
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2017

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The COSMOS-[O II] survey: Evolution of electron density with star formation rate'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this