Abstract
This paper offers new data bearing on the question of when English developed a definite article, distinct from the distal demonstrative. It focuses primarily on one criterion that has been used in dating this development, namely the inability of þe (Modern English the, the reflex of the demonstrative se) to be used as a pronoun. I argue that this criterion is not a satisfactory one and propose a treatment of þe as a form which could occupy either the head D of DP or the specifier of DP. This is an approach consistent with Crisma’s (2011) position that a definite article emerged within the Old English (OE) period. I offer a new piece of evidence supporting Crisma’s demonstration of a difference between OE poetry and the prose of the ninth century and later.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Let us have articles betwixt us |
| Subtitle of host publication | Papers in Historical and Comparative Linguistics in Honour of Johanna L. Wood |
| Editors | Sten Vikner, Henrik Jørgensen, Elly van Gelderen |
| Place of Publication | Denmark |
| Publisher | Aarhus University |
| Pages | 43-82 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 978-87-7507-359-7 |
| ISBN (Print) | 978-87-91134-03-6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2016 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The definite determiner in Early Middle English: What happened with þe'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver