Abstract
Live social media commentary increasingly accompanies televised political debates. This study examines the democratic role of live Twitter commentary by analyzing a sample of tweets published during the first 2016 presidential debate between Trump and Clinton. The practices of live commenters–including joke-sharing and fact-checking–are assessed in light of six perspectives on the democratic utility of such commentary. Results show that while Twitter commentary was predominantly humorous and driven by negativity towards the candidates, a sizeable proportion of users actively engaged in practices of alternative interpretation, critique, and correction, seeking democratic accountability.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 105-118 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Journal of Information Technology and Politics |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 3 Apr 2019 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The democratic role of social media in political debates: The use of Twitter in the first televised US presidential debate of 2016'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver