The doctoral experience in science: Challenging the current orthodoxy

Jim Cumming*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    38 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Drawing on the literature this article identifies five characteristics that are frequently attributed to the doctoral student experience in the natural and physical sciences. These are then used to assist with the interpretation of qualitative data derived from a study in the earth sciences at a research-intensive university in Australia. Case narrative is employed to synthesise three insider perspectives-a candidate and her co-supervisors-as well as to capture the particularity of the contemporary doctoral enterprise. While similarities to the current orthodoxy can be identified in this study, it is the subtle variations and significant points of departure that reveal a higher level of complexity than is generally acknowledged.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)877-890
    Number of pages14
    JournalBritish Educational Research Journal
    Volume35
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 2009

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The doctoral experience in science: Challenging the current orthodoxy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this