The Effect of Brief or Prolonged Bouts of Winning or Losing Male-Male Contests on Plasticity in Sexually Selected Traits

Lauren M. Harrison*, Regina Vega-Trejo, Michael D. Jennions

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    6 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Fight outcomes often affect male fitness by determin-ing their access to mates. Thus, “winner-loser” effects, where winners often win their next contest while losers tend to lose, can influence how males allocate resources toward pre-and postcopulatory traits. We experimentally manipulated the winning/losing experiences of pairs of size-matched male Gambusia holbrooki for 1 day, 1 week, or 3 weeks to test whether prior winning/losing experiences differen-tially affect the plasticity of male investment into either mating effort (precopulatory) or ejaculates (postcopulatory). When winner/loser pairs directly competed for a female, winners had better precopula-tory outcomes than losers for three of the four traits we measured: mating attempts, successful attempts, and time spent with the female (but not aggression). However, winners and losers did not differ in either total sperm counts or sperm velocity. Interestingly, absolute male size, an important predictor of fighting success, mediated winner-loser effects on how long males then spent near a female. Compared with losers, smaller winners spent more time with the female than did larger winners, suggesting that how males respond to prior social experiences is size dependent. We discuss the general importance of controlling for inherent male condition when comparing male investment into condition-dependent traits.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)442-459
    Number of pages18
    JournalAmerican Naturalist
    Volume201
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Mar 2023

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The Effect of Brief or Prolonged Bouts of Winning or Losing Male-Male Contests on Plasticity in Sexually Selected Traits'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this