Abstract
Energy efficient lamps offer significant energy savings throughout their life. However, there is a variety of energy saving lamps available and it is unclear which impacts the environment least throughout the lifecycle under different use patterns. Different use patterns have a significant impact on the lifetime of each light globe alternative and therefore affect the life cycle impact of each globe. This paper undertakes a series of Life Cycle Assessments on two alternative lighting choices (Light Emitting Diodes and Compact Florescent Lamps) under a range of use conditions. It was found that the environmental impacts were comparable for CFLs and LEDs, though significantly less than traditional incandescent, for a range of different use cases. The sensitivity analysis carried out shows that the variation in lamp parameters has a far greater effect on the lifecycle impact rather than the use patterns.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 185-190 |
Number of pages | 6 |
Journal | Procedia CIRP |
Volume | 40 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2016 |
Event | 13th Global Conference on Sustainable Manufacturing, GCSM 2015 - Binh Du'o'ng New City, Viet Nam Duration: 16 Sept 2015 → 18 Sept 2015 |