TY - JOUR
T1 - The Effect of Decisional Leader Procrastination on Employee Innovation
T2 - Investigating the Moderating Role of Employees’ Resistance to Change
AU - Haesevoets, Tessa
AU - De Cremer, David
AU - Hirst, Giles
AU - De Schutter, Leander
AU - Stouten, Jeroen
AU - van Dijke, Marius
AU - Van Hiel, Alain
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Authors 2021.
PY - 2022/2
Y1 - 2022/2
N2 - Most prior research has examined procrastination as a type of self-defeating behavior. The present research, however, focused on the social consequences of procrastination, by investigating how decisional leader procrastination as a leader trait affects others in the workplace. We specifically developed the argument that the way in which employees deal with changes plays a critical moderating role in the relationship between leader procrastination and employee innovation. More precisely, we hypothesized that decisional leader procrastination negatively impacts employee innovation, but only so for employees who are low (compared to high) in resistance to change. This prediction was tested in an experimental study (Study 1) and two double-source survey studies (Studies 2 and 3). In support of our prediction, the results showed that an indecisive leader indeed undermines the innovation of those employees who embrace—rather than resist—changes. Critically, however, our findings also illustrated that when being supervised by a decisive leader, these particular employees are actually most likely to bring forward the process of innovation. Theoretical and practical implications of our results are discussed.
AB - Most prior research has examined procrastination as a type of self-defeating behavior. The present research, however, focused on the social consequences of procrastination, by investigating how decisional leader procrastination as a leader trait affects others in the workplace. We specifically developed the argument that the way in which employees deal with changes plays a critical moderating role in the relationship between leader procrastination and employee innovation. More precisely, we hypothesized that decisional leader procrastination negatively impacts employee innovation, but only so for employees who are low (compared to high) in resistance to change. This prediction was tested in an experimental study (Study 1) and two double-source survey studies (Studies 2 and 3). In support of our prediction, the results showed that an indecisive leader indeed undermines the innovation of those employees who embrace—rather than resist—changes. Critically, however, our findings also illustrated that when being supervised by a decisive leader, these particular employees are actually most likely to bring forward the process of innovation. Theoretical and practical implications of our results are discussed.
KW - decisional leader procrastination
KW - employee innovation
KW - leader–subordinate interaction
KW - resistance to change
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85118181537&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/15480518211044166
DO - 10.1177/15480518211044166
M3 - Article
SN - 1548-0518
VL - 29
SP - 131
EP - 146
JO - Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies
JF - Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies
IS - 1
ER -