The effects of diffuse ionized gas and spatial resolution on metallicity gradients: TYPHOON two-dimensional spectrophotometry of M83

Henry Poetrodjojo*, Joshua J. D'Agostino, Brent Groves, Lisa Kewley, I. Ting Ho, Jeff Rich, Barry F. Madore, Mark Seibert

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    50 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    We present a systematic study of the diffuse ionized gas (DIG) in M83 and its effects on the measurement of metallicity gradients at varying resolution scales. Using spectrophotometric data cubes of M83 obtained at the 2.5m duPont telescope at Las Campanas Observatory as part of the TYPHOON programme, we separate the HII regions from the DIG using the [S II]/H α ratio, HIIPHOT (H II-finding algorithm), and the Hα surface brightness. We find that the contribution to the overall Hα luminosity is approximately equal for the HII and DIG regions. The data is then rebinned to simulate low-resolution observations at varying resolution scales from 41 pc up to 1005 pc. Metallicity gradients are measured using five different metallicity diagnostics at each resolution.We find that all metallicity diagnostics used are affected by the inclusion of DIG to varying degrees. We discuss the reasons why the metallicity gradients are significantly affected by DIG using the HII dominance and emission line ratio radial profiles. We find that applying the [S II]/H α cut will provide a closer estimate of the true metallicity gradient up to a resolution of 1005 pc for all metallicity diagnostics used in this study.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)79-96
    Number of pages18
    JournalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
    Volume487
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2019

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The effects of diffuse ionized gas and spatial resolution on metallicity gradients: TYPHOON two-dimensional spectrophotometry of M83'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this