The effects of light and noise from urban development on biodiversity: Implications for protected areas in Australia

Jenny Newport, David J. Shorthouse, Adrian D. Manning

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    48 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Global population growth and associated urban development are having profound effects on biodiversity. Two major outcomes of expanding development that affect wildlife are light and noise pollution. In this paper, we review literature reporting the effects of light and noise on biodiversity, and assess implications for conservation planning in Australia. Our results clearly indicate that light and noise pollution have the potential to affect the physiology, behaviour and reproduction of a range of animal taxa. Types of effects include changes in foraging and reproductive behaviours, reduction in animal fitness, increased risk of predation and reduced reproductive success. These could have flow-on consequences at the population and ecosystem levels. We found a significant gap in knowledge of the impact of these pollutants on Australian fauna. To reduce the effect of light and noise pollution, there needs to be careful planning of urban areas in relation to protected areas, and for biodiversity more generally. Potential measures include strategically planning the types of development and associated human activities adjacent to protected areas, and the use of shields and barriers, such as covers for lights or the use of dense native vegetation screens, while still allowing movement of animals. Changes in government standards and regulations could also help to reduce the impacts of light and noise pollution.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)204-214
    Number of pages11
    JournalEcological Management and Restoration
    Volume15
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The effects of light and noise from urban development on biodiversity: Implications for protected areas in Australia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this