The electoral connection in Australia: Candidate roles, campaign activity, and the popular vote

Donley T. Studlar*, Ian McAllister

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Studies of representational roles usually examine elected representatives rather than election candidates and make little attempt to link roles with either behavior or the popular vote that candidates attract. In this paper, we use 1990 Australian data to examine all major party election candidates, and show that candidates identify with three types of representational roles:locals, who focus on articulating local concerns and interests;partisans, who see their role in party political terms; and legislators, who emphasize the parliamentary role of an elected representative. Incumbents, especially party leaders, focus on the partisan role. Candidates in each of these three types have different views of the qualities that a candidate should possess and emphasize different forms of campaign activity. In turn, these roles have a modest impact on the popular vote that candidates attract, net of other factors. In Australia, incumbents rely on national partisan forces for reelection, while challengers rely much more on their own efforts.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)385-410
Number of pages26
JournalPolitical Behavior
Volume16
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 1994
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The electoral connection in Australia: Candidate roles, campaign activity, and the popular vote'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this