TY - JOUR
T1 - The elemental composition of the sun I. The intermediate mass elements Na to Ca
AU - Scott, Pat
AU - Grevesse, Nicolas
AU - Asplund, Martin
AU - Sauval, A. Jacques
AU - Lind, Karin
AU - Takeda, Yoichi
AU - Collet, Remo
AU - Trampedach, Regner
AU - Hayek, Wolfgang
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© ESO 2014.
PY - 2015/1/1
Y1 - 2015/1/1
N2 - The chemical composition of the Sun is an essential piece of reference data for astronomy, cosmology, astroparticle, space and geophysics: elemental abundances of essentially all astronomical objects are referenced to the solar composition, and basically every process involving the Sun depends on its composition. This article, dealing with the intermediate-mass elements Na to Ca, is the first in a series describing the comprehensive re-determination of the solar composition. In this series we severely scrutinise all ingredients of the analysis across all elements, to obtain the most accurate, homogeneous and reliable results possible. We employ a highly realistic 3D hydrodynamic model of the solar photosphere, which has successfully passed an arsenal of observational diagnostics. For comparison, and to quantify remaining systematic errors, we repeat the analysis using three different 1D hydrostatic model atmospheres (marcs, miss and Holweger & Müller 1974, Sol. Phys., 39, 19) and a horizontally and temporally-averaged version of the 3D model (〈3D〉). We account for departures from local thermodynamic equilibrium (LTE) wherever possible. We have scoured the literature for the best possible input data, carefully assessing transition probabilities, hyperfine splitting, partition functions and other data for inclusion in the analysis. We have put the lines we use through a very stringent quality check in terms of their observed profiles and atomic data, and discarded all that we suspect to be blended. Our final recommended 3D+NLTE abundances are: log εNa = 6:21 ± 0:04, log εMg = 7:59 ± 0:04, log εAl = 6:43 ± 0:04, log εSi = 7:51 ± 0:03, log εP = 5:41 ± 0:03, log εS = 7:13 ± 0:03, log εK = 5:04 ± 0:05 and log εCa = 6:32 ± 0:03. The uncertainties include both statistical and systematic errors. Our results are systematically smaller than most previous ones with the 1D semi-empirical Holweger & Müller model, whereas the 〈3D〉 model returns abundances very similar to the full 3D calculations. This analysis provides a complete description and a slight update of the results presented in Asplund et al. (2009, ARA&A, 47, 481) for Na to Ca, and includes full details of all lines and input data used.
AB - The chemical composition of the Sun is an essential piece of reference data for astronomy, cosmology, astroparticle, space and geophysics: elemental abundances of essentially all astronomical objects are referenced to the solar composition, and basically every process involving the Sun depends on its composition. This article, dealing with the intermediate-mass elements Na to Ca, is the first in a series describing the comprehensive re-determination of the solar composition. In this series we severely scrutinise all ingredients of the analysis across all elements, to obtain the most accurate, homogeneous and reliable results possible. We employ a highly realistic 3D hydrodynamic model of the solar photosphere, which has successfully passed an arsenal of observational diagnostics. For comparison, and to quantify remaining systematic errors, we repeat the analysis using three different 1D hydrostatic model atmospheres (marcs, miss and Holweger & Müller 1974, Sol. Phys., 39, 19) and a horizontally and temporally-averaged version of the 3D model (〈3D〉). We account for departures from local thermodynamic equilibrium (LTE) wherever possible. We have scoured the literature for the best possible input data, carefully assessing transition probabilities, hyperfine splitting, partition functions and other data for inclusion in the analysis. We have put the lines we use through a very stringent quality check in terms of their observed profiles and atomic data, and discarded all that we suspect to be blended. Our final recommended 3D+NLTE abundances are: log εNa = 6:21 ± 0:04, log εMg = 7:59 ± 0:04, log εAl = 6:43 ± 0:04, log εSi = 7:51 ± 0:03, log εP = 5:41 ± 0:03, log εS = 7:13 ± 0:03, log εK = 5:04 ± 0:05 and log εCa = 6:32 ± 0:03. The uncertainties include both statistical and systematic errors. Our results are systematically smaller than most previous ones with the 1D semi-empirical Holweger & Müller model, whereas the 〈3D〉 model returns abundances very similar to the full 3D calculations. This analysis provides a complete description and a slight update of the results presented in Asplund et al. (2009, ARA&A, 47, 481) for Na to Ca, and includes full details of all lines and input data used.
KW - Convection
KW - Line: formation
KW - Line: profiles
KW - Sun: abundances
KW - Sun: granulation
KW - Sun: photosphere
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84916910794&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1051/0004-6361/201424109
DO - 10.1051/0004-6361/201424109
M3 - Article
SN - 0004-6361
VL - 573
JO - Astronomy and Astrophysics
JF - Astronomy and Astrophysics
M1 - A25
ER -