The ends of deliberation: Meta-consensus and inter-subjective rationality as ideal outcomes

Simon Niemeyer*, John S. Dryzek

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    145 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Normative deliberative theory has contributed much to an understanding of ideal procedural standards, but there is considerable uncertainty regarding the appropriate nature of desired deliberative outcomes. In this paper we identify two inter-related concepts of meta-consensus and inter-subjective rationality as outcomes that an authentic deliberative process ought to produce. Importantly, these deliberative ends are consistent with ideal deliberative procedure. They are also empirically tractable, where preference transformation can be described in terms of underlying values, and judgments. Methods for assessing deliberative ends are provided and demonstrated using a case study.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)497-526
    Number of pages30
    JournalSwiss Political Science Review
    Volume13
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2007

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The ends of deliberation: Meta-consensus and inter-subjective rationality as ideal outcomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this