The Ethical and Civic Dimensions of Taste

Timothy Rowse, Michelle Kelly, Anna Cristina Pertierra, Emma Waterton

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

    Abstract

    We argue in this chapter that within taste there may be strong ethical commit­ments, including senses of solidarity principled, but also strongly felt with national and sub-national formations, such as those enjoined by the Australian dis­course of Reconciliation. To make this argument we engage with a critique of the representation of working class taste in Bourdieus Distinction (Bennett, T., 2011). Bennett questions Bourdieus reliance on aesthetic categories in his questionnaire. Discussing the items on which Bourdieu drew heavily in demonstrating the uni­formity of working class taste with regard to its exclusion from legitimate culture (Bennett, T., 2011: 537), Bennett points to other possible questions that would have revealed forms of pleasure and judgment associated with a wider range of cultural practices than those considered in Distinction. A survey instrument better suited to eliciting the distinctive forms of pleasure and judgment of the excluded would pose questions enabling respondents to show how they: connect aesthetic evaluations to ethical judgments as a positive value rather than as a failing; express preferences in hedonistic terms, linking aesthetic to bodily pleasures; and, connect cultural choices to forms of collective or group involvement
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationFields, Capitals, Habitus: Australian Culture, Inequalities and Social Divisions
    Place of PublicationUnited Kingdom
    PublisherRoutledge
    Pages311-329
    Volume1
    ISBN (Print)9781138392298
    Publication statusPublished - 2021

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The Ethical and Civic Dimensions of Taste'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this