The Evaluation of Case-managed Programs Targeting Individuals at Risk of Radicalisation

Adrian Cherney*, Emma Belton

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There currently exists little evidence on the effectiveness of case-managed programs targeting radicalised individuals. This paper provides results from an evaluation of two case-managed interventions implemented by police in Australia, referred to as Intervention 1 and Intervention 2. Drawing on client case note data and interviews, the paper provides quantitative and qualitative results. It examines client change using a five-point metric and details two individual case studies. Results provide data on radicalised behaviours, intervention goals and services offered to clients. Individual client progress is explored, and the overall effectiveness of both programs examined. The results show a positive relationship between client change and different measures of engagement. Limitations of the evaluation methodology and data sources are acknowledged and addressed. Lessons are highlighted relating to the assessment of client change, program evaluation and the role of interventions in supporting disengagement.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)846-865
Number of pages20
JournalTerrorism and Political Violence
Volume35
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Evaluation of Case-managed Programs Targeting Individuals at Risk of Radicalisation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this