The evolution of imprinting: Chromosomal mapping of orthologues of mammalian imprinted domains in monotreme and marsupial mammals

Carol A. Edwards, Willem Rens, Oliver Clarke, Andrew J. Mungall, Timothy Hore, Jennifer A.Marshall Graves, Ian Dunham, Anne C. Ferguson-Smith*, Malcolm A. Ferguson-Smith

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    36 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Background. The evolution of genomic imprinting, the parental-origin specific expression of genes, is the subject of much debate. There are several theories to account for how the mechanism evolved including the hypothesis that it was driven by the evolution of X-inactivation, or that it arose from an ancestrally imprinted chromosome. Results. Here we demonstrate that mammalian orthologues of imprinted genes are dispersed amongst autosomes in both monotreme and marsupial karyotypes. Conclusion. These data, along with the similar distribution seen in birds, suggest that imprinted genes were not located on an ancestrally imprinted chromosome or associated with a sex chromosome. Our results suggest imprinting evolution was a stepwise, adaptive process, with each gene/cluster independently becoming imprinted as the need arose.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number157
    JournalBMC Evolutionary Biology
    Volume7
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2007

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The evolution of imprinting: Chromosomal mapping of orthologues of mammalian imprinted domains in monotreme and marsupial mammals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this