The expression of conflict in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups

Elizabeth V. Hobman; Prashant Bordia; Bernd Irmer; Artemis Chang

doi:10.1177/104649640203300403

The expression of conflict in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups

Elizabeth V. Hobman, Prashant Bordia^*, Bernd Irmer, Artemis Chang

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

65 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study integrated the research streams of computer-mediated communication (CMC) and group conflict by comparing the expression of different types of conflict in CMC groups and face-to-face (FTP) groups over time. The main aim of the study was to compare the cues-filtered-out approach against the social information processing theory. A laboratory study was conducted with 39 groups (19 CMC and 20 FTF) in which members were required to work together over three sessions. The frequencies of task, process, and relationship conflict were analyzed. Findings supported the social information processing theory. There was more process and relationship conflict in CMC groups compared to FTF groups on Day 1. However, this difference disappeared on Days 2 and 3. There was no difference between CMC and FTF groups in the amount of task conflict expressed on any day.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	439-465
Number of pages	27
Journal	Small Group Research
Volume	33
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/104649640203300403
Publication status	Published - Aug 2002
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

10.1177/104649640203300403

Cite this

@article{bb3a85ffb6a24174aeafa931b7eda306,

title = "The expression of conflict in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups",

abstract = "This study integrated the research streams of computer-mediated communication (CMC) and group conflict by comparing the expression of different types of conflict in CMC groups and face-to-face (FTP) groups over time. The main aim of the study was to compare the cues-filtered-out approach against the social information processing theory. A laboratory study was conducted with 39 groups (19 CMC and 20 FTF) in which members were required to work together over three sessions. The frequencies of task, process, and relationship conflict were analyzed. Findings supported the social information processing theory. There was more process and relationship conflict in CMC groups compared to FTF groups on Day 1. However, this difference disappeared on Days 2 and 3. There was no difference between CMC and FTF groups in the amount of task conflict expressed on any day.",

author = "Hobman, {Elizabeth V.} and Prashant Bordia and Bernd Irmer and Artemis Chang",

year = "2002",

month = aug,

doi = "10.1177/104649640203300403",

language = "English",

volume = "33",

pages = "439--465",

journal = "Small Group Research",

issn = "1046-4964",

publisher = "SAGE Publications",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The expression of conflict in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups

AU - Hobman, Elizabeth V.

AU - Bordia, Prashant

AU - Irmer, Bernd

AU - Chang, Artemis

PY - 2002/8

Y1 - 2002/8

N2 - This study integrated the research streams of computer-mediated communication (CMC) and group conflict by comparing the expression of different types of conflict in CMC groups and face-to-face (FTP) groups over time. The main aim of the study was to compare the cues-filtered-out approach against the social information processing theory. A laboratory study was conducted with 39 groups (19 CMC and 20 FTF) in which members were required to work together over three sessions. The frequencies of task, process, and relationship conflict were analyzed. Findings supported the social information processing theory. There was more process and relationship conflict in CMC groups compared to FTF groups on Day 1. However, this difference disappeared on Days 2 and 3. There was no difference between CMC and FTF groups in the amount of task conflict expressed on any day.

AB - This study integrated the research streams of computer-mediated communication (CMC) and group conflict by comparing the expression of different types of conflict in CMC groups and face-to-face (FTP) groups over time. The main aim of the study was to compare the cues-filtered-out approach against the social information processing theory. A laboratory study was conducted with 39 groups (19 CMC and 20 FTF) in which members were required to work together over three sessions. The frequencies of task, process, and relationship conflict were analyzed. Findings supported the social information processing theory. There was more process and relationship conflict in CMC groups compared to FTF groups on Day 1. However, this difference disappeared on Days 2 and 3. There was no difference between CMC and FTF groups in the amount of task conflict expressed on any day.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036330940&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/104649640203300403

DO - 10.1177/104649640203300403

M3 - Article

SN - 1046-4964

VL - 33

SP - 439

EP - 465

JO - Small Group Research

JF - Small Group Research

IS - 4

ER -

The expression of conflict in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this