The ‘forever war’ on red tape and the struggle to improve regulation

Arie Freiberg*, Monica Pfeffer, Jeroen van der Heijden

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Since the 1970s, Australian governments have sought to reduce regulatory burdens, particularly on business, subject regulation to rigorous cost–benefit analysis and constrain both the stock and flow of new regulation. Yet, however, measured, regulation continues to grow, frequently in response to community demand. In this article, we interrogate both the more extreme claims of the anti-regulation advocates and the alleged successes of anti-red tape initiatives, identifying a critical clash of values over the role of the state and the appropriate relationship between government, business and the community. We conclude by arguing that to deliver desirable societal, economic and democratic outcomes, we need to acknowledge regulation as an asset, professionalise its workforce and more actively assert its public value.

Original languageEnglish
JournalAustralian Journal of Public Administration
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2022
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The ‘forever war’ on red tape and the struggle to improve regulation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this