The impact of independence on reported aid performance

Terence Wood*, Stephen Howes

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In this paper we test whether the reported performance of aid projects changes when the process of producing project appraisals is made more independent. We do this using a dataset of Australian aid appraisals and take advantage of a change that occurred when a more independent process involving the central aid evaluation unit of the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) and external contractors was put in place to review appraisals of recently completed projects. Using difference-in-differences and contrasting assessments of ongoing projects, which the appraisal process was not changed for, and completed projects, where the process was changed, we show that introducing more independence led to a substantial fall in how successful projects were deemed to be. We also show that the change probably led to more accurate recording of COVID-19′s impact on Australian aid, as well as more accurate assessments of the quality of Australia's aid to Papua New Guinea, its largest aid partner. As we do this, we take care to demonstrate that our findings are robust to the types of methodological issues that can affect difference-in-differences studies.

Original languageEnglish
Article number106829
Number of pages14
JournalWorld Development
Volume186
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The impact of independence on reported aid performance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this