Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 254-266 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Analysis |
Volume | 61 |
Issue number | 271 |
DOIs |
|
Publication status | Published - 2001 |
The incoherence argument: Reply to Schafer-Landau
Michael Smith*
*Corresponding author for this work
Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review
17
Citations
(Scopus)