| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 254-266 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Analysis |
| Volume | 61 |
| Issue number | 271 |
| DOIs |
|
| Publication status | Published - 2001 |
The incoherence argument: Reply to Schafer-Landau
Michael Smith*
*Corresponding author for this work
Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review
17
Citations
(Scopus)