The Knowledge Argument, Diaphanousness, Representationalism

Frank Jackson*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This chapter develops a representationalist view about perceptual experience and defends its application to the knowledge argument. This view is based partly on the idea that perceptual experience is diaphanous - in other words, that accessing the nature of the experience itself is nothing other than accessing the properties of its object. It is argued that although the diaphanousness thesis alone does not entail representationalism, the thesis supports an inference from a weaker to a stronger version of representationalism. On the weak version, perceptual experience is essentially representational. On the strong version, how an experience represents things as being exhausts its experiential nature. Strong representationalism undermines the claim that Mary learns new truths when she leaves the room.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationPhenomenal Concepts and Phenomenal Knowledge
Subtitle of host publicationNew Essays on Consciousness and Physicalism
PublisherOxford University Press
ISBN (Electronic)9780199871339
ISBN (Print)9780195171655
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2007

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Knowledge Argument, Diaphanousness, Representationalism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this