The law of the sea, international courts, and judicialization

Donald R. Rothwell*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Dispute settlement is entrenched in the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) through the Part XV compulsory mechanisms. It is also reflected in UNCLOS's indication that delimitation of the exclusive economic zone or the continental shelf is to be by way of agreement between coastal states. While maritime boundary delimitation may be viewed as dominated by judicialization, that is not reflected in UNCLOS. The maritime boundary delimitation project unleashed by UNCLOS gave primacy to delimitation by agreement, with third party settlement under Part XV the secondary mechanism. The 2018 Australia/Timor-Leste maritime boundary settlement highlights how, even when Part XV third party mechanisms were used, the coastal states were able to reach agreement on a maritime boundary by negotiation, without recourse to judicialization.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)373-377
Number of pages5
JournalAJIL Unbound
Volume115
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Nov 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The law of the sea, international courts, and judicialization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this