The microstructure of white feathers predicts their visible and near-infrared reflectance properties

Devi Stuart-Fox*, Elizabeth Newton, Raoul A. Mulder, Liliana D’Alba, Matthew D. Shawkey, Branislav Igic

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    24 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Research on the optical properties of animal integuments, including fur, feather, skin and cuticle, has focussed almost exclusively on animal-visible wavelengths within the narrow range of 300–700 nm. By contrast, the near-infrared (NIR) portion of direct sunlight, spanning 700–2600 nm, has been largely ignored despite its potentially important thermal consequences. We quantified variation in visible and NIR reflectance and transmission for white body contour feathers of 50 bird species, and examined how well they are predicted by feather macro- and micro-structural morphology. Both visible and NIR reflectance of the feathers varied substantially across species. Larger, thicker, and sparser feathers that are characteristic of larger species, and feathers with rounder barbs and more closely spaced barbules, had high average reflectance, particularly within avian-visible wavelengths (300–700 nm). Feathers with rounder barbs and more closely situated barbules also had high average reflectance, particularly for NIR wavelengths. Barb roundness and barbule density were the only predictors of NIR reflectance after accounting for variation in visible reflectance and body size. Our results highlight the potential for adaptive variation in NIR reflectance mediated by feather structure, which may inform the design of functional materials to control light and heat.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article numbere0199129
    JournalPLoS ONE
    Volume13
    Issue number7
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jul 2018

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The microstructure of white feathers predicts their visible and near-infrared reflectance properties'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this