The nature of species: A rejoinder to Zachos et al.

Colin P. Groves

doi:10.1016/j.mambio.2012.09.009

The nature of species: A rejoinder to Zachos et al.

Colin P. Groves^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

I argue strongly that the Phylogenetic Species Concept offers the only way of defining species that makes them testable, as any scientific hypothesis should be. The criticisms made by . Zachos et al. (in press) are not cogent, and do not offer a means of testing species proposals. Nonetheless, their comments on species concepts in conservation do provide support to the value of the Phylogenetic Species Concept.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	7-9
Number of pages	3
Journal	Mammalian Biology
Volume	78
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2012.09.009
Publication status	Published - Jan 2013

Access to Document

10.1016/j.mambio.2012.09.009

Cite this

@article{05d881fd22b5489a97ffa7029f7ae8d5,

title = "The nature of species: A rejoinder to Zachos et al.",

abstract = "I argue strongly that the Phylogenetic Species Concept offers the only way of defining species that makes them testable, as any scientific hypothesis should be. The criticisms made by . Zachos et al. (in press) are not cogent, and do not offer a means of testing species proposals. Nonetheless, their comments on species concepts in conservation do provide support to the value of the Phylogenetic Species Concept.",

keywords = "Capricornis, Cervus corsicanus, Oreotragus, Phylogenetic Species Concept, Species concepts in conservation",

author = "Groves, \{Colin P.\}",

year = "2013",

month = jan,

doi = "10.1016/j.mambio.2012.09.009",

language = "English",

volume = "78",

pages = "7--9",

journal = "Mammalian Biology",

issn = "1616-5047",

publisher = "Springer Science+Business Media B.V.",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The nature of species

T2 - A rejoinder to Zachos et al.

AU - Groves, Colin P.

PY - 2013/1

Y1 - 2013/1

N2 - I argue strongly that the Phylogenetic Species Concept offers the only way of defining species that makes them testable, as any scientific hypothesis should be. The criticisms made by . Zachos et al. (in press) are not cogent, and do not offer a means of testing species proposals. Nonetheless, their comments on species concepts in conservation do provide support to the value of the Phylogenetic Species Concept.

AB - I argue strongly that the Phylogenetic Species Concept offers the only way of defining species that makes them testable, as any scientific hypothesis should be. The criticisms made by . Zachos et al. (in press) are not cogent, and do not offer a means of testing species proposals. Nonetheless, their comments on species concepts in conservation do provide support to the value of the Phylogenetic Species Concept.

KW - Capricornis

KW - Cervus corsicanus

KW - Oreotragus

KW - Phylogenetic Species Concept

KW - Species concepts in conservation

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84869877450

U2 - 10.1016/j.mambio.2012.09.009

DO - 10.1016/j.mambio.2012.09.009

M3 - Review article

SN - 1616-5047

VL - 78

SP - 7

EP - 9

JO - Mammalian Biology

JF - Mammalian Biology

IS - 1

ER -

The nature of species: A rejoinder to Zachos et al.

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this