The nature of theory in Information Systems

Shirley Gregor*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    2442 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The aim of this research essay is to examine the structural nature of theory in Information Systems. Despite the importance of theory, questions relating to its form and structure are neglected in comparison with questions relating to epistemology. The essay addresses issues of causality, explanation, prediction, and generalization that underlie an understanding of theory. A taxonomy is proposed that classifies information systems theories with respect to the manner in which four central goals are addressed: analysis, explanation, prediction, and prescription. Five interrelated types of theory are distinguished: (1) theory for analyzing, (2) theory for explaining, (3) theory for predicting, (4) theory for explaining and predicting, and (5) theory for design and action. Examples illustrate the nature of each theory type. The applicability of the taxonomy is demonstrated by classifying a sample of journal articles. The paper contributes by showing that multiple views of theory exist and by exposing the assumptions underlying different viewpoints. In addition, it is suggested that the type of theory under development can influence the choice of an epistemological approach. Support is given for the legitimacy and value of each theory type. The building of integrated bodies of theory that encompass all theory types is advocated.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)611-642
    Number of pages32
    JournalMIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems
    Volume30
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Sept 2006

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The nature of theory in Information Systems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this