The Non-arbitrariness of Reasons: Reply to Lenman

Michael Smith*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    James Lenman is critical of my claim that moral requirements are requirements of reason. I argue that his criticisms miss their target. More importantly, I argue that the anti-rationalism that informs Lenman’s criticisms is itself implausible.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)178-193
    Number of pages16
    JournalUtilitas
    Volume11
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jul 1999

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The Non-arbitrariness of Reasons: Reply to Lenman'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this