Abstract
James Lenman is critical of my claim that moral requirements are requirements of reason. I argue that his criticisms miss their target. More importantly, I argue that the anti-rationalism that informs Lenman’s criticisms is itself implausible.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 178-193 |
Number of pages | 16 |
Journal | Utilitas |
Volume | 11 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jul 1999 |