The Non-arbitrariness of Reasons: Reply to Lenman

Michael Smith

doi:10.1017/S0953820800002417

The Non-arbitrariness of Reasons: Reply to Lenman

Michael Smith^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

James Lenman is critical of my claim that moral requirements are requirements of reason. I argue that his criticisms miss their target. More importantly, I argue that the anti-rationalism that informs Lenman’s criticisms is itself implausible.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	178-193
Number of pages	16
Journal	Utilitas
Volume	11
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820800002417
Publication status	Published - Jul 1999

Access to Document

10.1017/S0953820800002417

Cite this

@article{4725f5f4e9e8461ea53e0802c62bbf33,

title = "The Non-arbitrariness of Reasons: Reply to Lenman",

abstract = "James Lenman is critical of my claim that moral requirements are requirements of reason. I argue that his criticisms miss their target. More importantly, I argue that the anti-rationalism that informs Lenman{\textquoteright}s criticisms is itself implausible.",

author = "Michael Smith",

year = "1999",

month = jul,

doi = "10.1017/S0953820800002417",

language = "English",

volume = "11",

pages = "178--193",

journal = "Utilitas",

issn = "0953-8208",

publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Non-arbitrariness of Reasons

T2 - Reply to Lenman

AU - Smith, Michael

PY - 1999/7

Y1 - 1999/7

N2 - James Lenman is critical of my claim that moral requirements are requirements of reason. I argue that his criticisms miss their target. More importantly, I argue that the anti-rationalism that informs Lenman’s criticisms is itself implausible.

AB - James Lenman is critical of my claim that moral requirements are requirements of reason. I argue that his criticisms miss their target. More importantly, I argue that the anti-rationalism that informs Lenman’s criticisms is itself implausible.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85007958847

U2 - 10.1017/S0953820800002417

DO - 10.1017/S0953820800002417

M3 - Article

SN - 0953-8208

VL - 11

SP - 178

EP - 193

JO - Utilitas

JF - Utilitas

IS - 2

ER -

The Non-arbitrariness of Reasons: Reply to Lenman

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this