Abstract
Several Australian languages show tense marking on non-verbal items, including the Karnic languages Pitta-Pitta and Wangkajutjuru (formerly spoken in Western Queensland). In these languages the forms of core case markers and the ergative/accusative split vary according to the tense and mood of the clause. Here I describe tense marking in the languages and the differences between sources and dialects, and discuss the etymologies of the case markers. I discuss sources for the future-marking construction and argue that these tense-marking patterns arose from the reanalysis of a construction which marked reduced transitivity. While several other constructions have been proposed in the literature as the source for Pitta-Pitta's case marking, I argue here that they do not adequately account for all the facts.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 163-183 |
Number of pages | 21 |
Journal | Australian Journal of Linguistics |
Volume | 24 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Oct 2004 |
Externally published | Yes |