Abstract
Several Australian languages show tense marking on non-verbal items, including the Karnic languages Pitta-Pitta and Wangkajutjuru (formerly spoken in Western Queensland). In these languages the forms of core case markers and the ergative/accusative split vary according to the tense and mood of the clause. Here I describe tense marking in the languages and the differences between sources and dialects, and discuss the etymologies of the case markers. I discuss sources for the future-marking construction and argue that these tense-marking patterns arose from the reanalysis of a construction which marked reduced transitivity. While several other constructions have been proposed in the literature as the source for Pitta-Pitta's case marking, I argue here that they do not adequately account for all the facts.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 163-183 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Australian Journal of Linguistics |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Oct 2004 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The origins of tense-based case marking in Pitta-Pitta and Wangkajutjuru'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver