TY - JOUR
T1 - The other cooperation problem
T2 - Generating benefit
AU - Calcott, Brett
PY - 2008/3
Y1 - 2008/3
N2 - Understanding how cooperation evolves is central to explaining some core features of our biological world. Many important evolutionary events, such as the arrival of multicellularity or the origins of eusociality, are cooperative ventures between formerly solitary individuals. Explanations of the evolution of cooperation have primarily involved showing how cooperation can be maintained in the face of free-riding individuals whose success gradually undermines cooperation. In this paper I argue that there is a second, distinct, and less well explored, problem of cooperation that I call the generation of benefit. Focusing on how benefit is generated within a group poses a different problem: how is it that individuals in a group can (at least in principle) do better than those who remain solitary? I present several different ways that benefit may be generated, each with different implications for how cooperation might be initiated, how it might further evolve, and how it might interact with different ways of maintaining cooperation. I argue that in some cases of cooperation, the most important underlying 'problem' of cooperation may be how to generate benefit, rather than how to reduce conflict or prevent free-riding.
AB - Understanding how cooperation evolves is central to explaining some core features of our biological world. Many important evolutionary events, such as the arrival of multicellularity or the origins of eusociality, are cooperative ventures between formerly solitary individuals. Explanations of the evolution of cooperation have primarily involved showing how cooperation can be maintained in the face of free-riding individuals whose success gradually undermines cooperation. In this paper I argue that there is a second, distinct, and less well explored, problem of cooperation that I call the generation of benefit. Focusing on how benefit is generated within a group poses a different problem: how is it that individuals in a group can (at least in principle) do better than those who remain solitary? I present several different ways that benefit may be generated, each with different implications for how cooperation might be initiated, how it might further evolve, and how it might interact with different ways of maintaining cooperation. I argue that in some cases of cooperation, the most important underlying 'problem' of cooperation may be how to generate benefit, rather than how to reduce conflict or prevent free-riding.
KW - Cooperation
KW - Division of labour
KW - Major transitions
KW - Plasticity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38649105772&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10539-007-9095-5
DO - 10.1007/s10539-007-9095-5
M3 - Article
SN - 0169-3867
VL - 23
SP - 179
EP - 203
JO - Biology and Philosophy
JF - Biology and Philosophy
IS - 2
ER -