The Ownership of Confiscated Proceeds of Corruption Under the UN Convention Against Corruption

Anton Moiseienko*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Article 51 of the United Nations Convention against Corruption sets forth the return of assets diverted through corruption as a fundamental principle of the Convention. This raises the question of whether the State where the stolen assets are located is entitled to refuse their repatriation or subject it to certain conditions. This article analyses the Convention and the policy considerations behind it and argues that such a State has a wider discretion over the return of stolen assets than is often thought. Furthermore, the article argues that the rule of law may be better served if States take vigorous action to confiscate the proceeds of corruption regardless of whether they are ultimately repatriated.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)669-694
Number of pages26
JournalInternational and Comparative Law Quarterly
Volume67
Issue number3
Early online date23 May 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Ownership of Confiscated Proceeds of Corruption Under the UN Convention Against Corruption'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this