Abstract
Article 51 of the United Nations Convention against Corruption sets forth the return of assets diverted through corruption as a fundamental principle of the Convention. This raises the question of whether the State where the stolen assets are located is entitled to refuse their repatriation or subject it to certain conditions. This article analyses the Convention and the policy considerations behind it and argues that such a State has a wider discretion over the return of stolen assets than is often thought. Furthermore, the article argues that the rule of law may be better served if States take vigorous action to confiscate the proceeds of corruption regardless of whether they are ultimately repatriated.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 669-694 |
Number of pages | 26 |
Journal | International and Comparative Law Quarterly |
Volume | 67 |
Issue number | 3 |
Early online date | 23 May 2018 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jul 2018 |
Externally published | Yes |