TY - JOUR
T1 - The Palomar kernel-phase experiment
T2 - Testing kernel phase interferometry for ground-based astronomical observations
AU - Pope, Benjamin
AU - Tuthill, Peter
AU - Hinkley, Sasha
AU - Ireland, Michael J.
AU - Greenbaum, Alexandra
AU - Latyshev, Alexey
AU - Monnier, John D.
AU - Martinache, Frantz
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 The Authors. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society.
PY - 2016/1/11
Y1 - 2016/1/11
N2 - At present, the principal limitation on the resolution and contrast of astronomical imaging instruments comes from aberrations in the optical path, which may be imposed by the Earth's turbulent atmosphere or by variations in the alignment and shape of the telescope optics. These errors can be corrected physically,with active and adaptive optics, and in post-processing of the resulting image.Arecently developed adaptive optics post-processing technique, called kernelphase interferometry, uses linear combinations of phases that are self-calibrating with respect to small errors, with the goal of constructing observables that are robust against the residual optical aberrations in otherwise well-corrected imaging systems. Here, we present a direct comparison between kernel phase and the more established competing techniques, aperture masking interferometry, point spread function (PSF) fitting and bispectral analysis.We resolve the α Ophiuchi binary system near periastron, using the Palomar 200-Inch Telescope. This is the first case in which kernel phase has been used with a full aperture to resolve a system close to the diffraction limit with ground-based extreme adaptive optics observations. Excellent agreement in astrometric quantities is found between kernel phase and masking, and kernel phase significantly outperforms PSF fitting and bispectral analysis, demonstrating its viability as an alternative to conventional non-redundant masking under appropriate conditions.
AB - At present, the principal limitation on the resolution and contrast of astronomical imaging instruments comes from aberrations in the optical path, which may be imposed by the Earth's turbulent atmosphere or by variations in the alignment and shape of the telescope optics. These errors can be corrected physically,with active and adaptive optics, and in post-processing of the resulting image.Arecently developed adaptive optics post-processing technique, called kernelphase interferometry, uses linear combinations of phases that are self-calibrating with respect to small errors, with the goal of constructing observables that are robust against the residual optical aberrations in otherwise well-corrected imaging systems. Here, we present a direct comparison between kernel phase and the more established competing techniques, aperture masking interferometry, point spread function (PSF) fitting and bispectral analysis.We resolve the α Ophiuchi binary system near periastron, using the Palomar 200-Inch Telescope. This is the first case in which kernel phase has been used with a full aperture to resolve a system close to the diffraction limit with ground-based extreme adaptive optics observations. Excellent agreement in astrometric quantities is found between kernel phase and masking, and kernel phase significantly outperforms PSF fitting and bispectral analysis, demonstrating its viability as an alternative to conventional non-redundant masking under appropriate conditions.
KW - Instrumentation: adaptive optics
KW - Instrumentation: high angular resolution
KW - Techniques: image processing
KW - Techniques: interferometric
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015690784&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/mnras/stv2442
DO - 10.1093/mnras/stv2442
M3 - Article
SN - 0035-8711
VL - 455
SP - 1647
EP - 1653
JO - Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
JF - Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
IS - 2
ER -