The Pandemic Paradox in International Law

Peter G. Danchin*, Jeremy Farrall, Shruti Rana, Imogen Saunders

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    17 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This Essay examines a series of paradoxes that have rendered the international legal order's mechanisms for collective action powerless precisely when they are needed most to fight COVID-19. The patriotism paradox is that disengagement from the international legal order weakens rather than strengthens state sovereignty. The border paradox is that securing domestic populations by excluding noncitizens, in the absence of accompanying regulatory mechanisms to secure adherence to internal health measures, accelerates viral spread among citizens. The equality paradox is that while pandemics pose an equal threat to all people, their impacts compound existing inequalities.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)598-607
    Number of pages10
    JournalAmerican Journal of International Law
    Volume114
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2020

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The Pandemic Paradox in International Law'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this