The personal/subpersonal distinction

Zoe Drayson*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

67 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Daniel Dennett's distinction between personal and subpersonal explanations was fundamental in establishing the philosophical foundations of cognitive science. Since it was first introduced in 1969, the personal/subpersonal distinction has been adapted to fit different approaches to the mind. In one example of this, the 'Pittsburgh school' of philosophers attempted to map Dennett's distinction onto their own distinction between the 'space of reasons' and the 'space of causes'. A second example can be found in much contemporary philosophy of psychology, where Dennett's distinction has been presumed to be equivalent to Stephen Stich's distinction between doxastic and subdoxastic states. Both these interpretations of the personal/subpersonal distinction, and also Dennett's own philosophical views of the mind, go beyond the personal/subpersonal distinction itself. They each involve supplementing the distinction between personal and subpersonal explanations with metaphysical claims about the relationship between the two kinds of explanation and the entities they posit.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)338-346
Number of pages9
JournalPhilosophy Compass
Volume9
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The personal/subpersonal distinction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this