The Political Glass Cliff: Understanding How Seat Selection Contributes to the Underperformance of Ethnic Minority Candidates

Clara Kulich*, Michelle K. Ryan, S. Alexander Haslam

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

An archival study of U.K. General Election results from 2001, 2005, and 2010 revealed that Conservative black and minority ethnic (BME) candidates were less successful than their white counterparts. However, mediation analyses demonstrate that this lack of success can be explained by the lower winnability of BME candidates' seats, such that the opposition candidate held a seat with a significantly larger majority compared with white candidates' opponents. Results and implications are discussed in the framework of the "glass cliff," previously demonstrated for women, in the sense that the seats minority groups contested were harder to win compared with majority groups.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)84-95
Number of pages12
JournalPolitical Research Quarterly
Volume67
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Political Glass Cliff: Understanding How Seat Selection Contributes to the Underperformance of Ethnic Minority Candidates'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this