The Population Dimension in the Intergenerational Reports

Peter McDonald*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    3 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The demographic assumptions and outcomes in the three successive Intergenerational Reports have differed enormously. This has brought a degree of derision upon the production of these reports in the serious press. Furthermore, the Intergenerational Reports' projections of labour force participation rates have proven to be very wrong in the short term. The fourth Intergenerational Report will need to address this credibility gap. This article analyses the reasons that the Intergenerational Reports' projections have been wide of the mark and makes suggestions about future approaches.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)335-343
    Number of pages9
    JournalAustralian Economic Review
    Volume45
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Sept 2012

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The Population Dimension in the Intergenerational Reports'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this