Abstract
The demographic assumptions and outcomes in the three successive Intergenerational Reports have differed enormously. This has brought a degree of derision upon the production of these reports in the serious press. Furthermore, the Intergenerational Reports' projections of labour force participation rates have proven to be very wrong in the short term. The fourth Intergenerational Report will need to address this credibility gap. This article analyses the reasons that the Intergenerational Reports' projections have been wide of the mark and makes suggestions about future approaches.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 335-343 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Australian Economic Review |
Volume | 45 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Sept 2012 |