The precariousness of the glass cliff: How gender stereotypes affect leader evaluations

Michelle K. Ryan, Janka I. Stoker

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Two studies examined evaluations of female and male leaders across two crisis-situations (with or without social resources). In the situation without social resources, a female leader was evaluated more positively because of her ability to establish acceptance (Study 1). This effect is driven by the stereotypical belief that female leaders possess communal traits (Study 2). Where social resources are available, people reverted to a think manager - think male association, evaluating a male leader more positively.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)737-742
Number of pages6
JournalAcademy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012
Externally publishedYes
Event72nd Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, AOM 2012 - Boston, United States
Duration: 7 Aug 201210 Aug 2012

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The precariousness of the glass cliff: How gender stereotypes affect leader evaluations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this