TY - JOUR
T1 - The predictability of extinction
T2 - Biological and external correlates of decline in mammals
AU - Cardillo, Marcel
AU - MacE, Georgina M.
AU - Gittleman, John L.
AU - Jones, Kate E.
AU - Bielby, Jon
AU - Purvis, Andy
PY - 2008/6/22
Y1 - 2008/6/22
N2 - Extinction risk varies among species, and comparative analyses can help clarify the causes of this variation. Here we present a phylogenetic comparative analysis of species-level extinction risk across nearly the whole of the class Mammalia. Our aims were to examine systematically the degree to which general predictors of extinction risk can be identified, and to investigate the relative importance of different types of predictors (life history, ecological, human impact and environmental) in determining extinction risk. A single global model explained 27.3% of variation in mammal extinction risk, but explanatory power was lower for region-specific models (median R2=0.248) and usually higher for taxon-specific models (median R2=0.383). Geographical range size, human population density and latitude were the most consistently significant predictors of extinction risk, but otherwise there was little evidence for general, prescriptive indicators of high extinction risk across mammals. Our results therefore support the view that comparative models of relatively narrow taxonomic scope are likely to be the most precise.
AB - Extinction risk varies among species, and comparative analyses can help clarify the causes of this variation. Here we present a phylogenetic comparative analysis of species-level extinction risk across nearly the whole of the class Mammalia. Our aims were to examine systematically the degree to which general predictors of extinction risk can be identified, and to investigate the relative importance of different types of predictors (life history, ecological, human impact and environmental) in determining extinction risk. A single global model explained 27.3% of variation in mammal extinction risk, but explanatory power was lower for region-specific models (median R2=0.248) and usually higher for taxon-specific models (median R2=0.383). Geographical range size, human population density and latitude were the most consistently significant predictors of extinction risk, but otherwise there was little evidence for general, prescriptive indicators of high extinction risk across mammals. Our results therefore support the view that comparative models of relatively narrow taxonomic scope are likely to be the most precise.
KW - Phylogenetically independent contrasts
KW - Red List
KW - Supertree
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=43249104270&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1098/rspb.2008.0179
DO - 10.1098/rspb.2008.0179
M3 - Article
SN - 0962-8452
VL - 275
SP - 1441
EP - 1448
JO - Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
JF - Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
IS - 1641
ER -