The public's stigmatizing attitudes towards people with mental disorders: How important are biomedical conceptualizations?

A. F. Jorm, K. M. Griffiths

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    188 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Objective: This study examined hypotheses that stigmatizing attitudes are increased by use of psychiatric labels, by conceptualization of symptoms as a medical illness and by belief in genetic causes. Method: A survey of 3998 Australian adults asked questions about one of four vignettes: early schizophrenia, chronic schizophrenia, depression and depression with suicidal thoughts. Attitudes were measured by a social distance scale and a question about likely dangerousness. Results: Social distance was unrelated to the hypothesized factors. For schizophrenia (but not depression), belief in dangerousness was predicted by medical illness conceptualizations and genetic causal attribution. However, more important factors were the behaviours in the vignette and the belief that they are because of weakness of character. Conclusion: Biomedical conceptualizations are not the major cause of stigma, rather it is the behaviour associated with mental illness and the belief that this is because of personal weakness.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)315-321
    Number of pages7
    JournalActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica
    Volume118
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Oct 2008

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The public's stigmatizing attitudes towards people with mental disorders: How important are biomedical conceptualizations?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this