The publishing imperative: The pervasive influence of publication metrics

Colin Steele*, Linda Butler, Danny Kingsley

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    65 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This article summarises the effects of the increasing global trend towards measuring research quality and effectiveness through, in particular, publication-based metrics, and its effects on scholarly communication. Such metrics are increasingly influencing the behaviour patterns of administrators, publishers, librarians, and researchers. Impact and citation measures, which often rely solely on Thomson Scientific data, are examined in the context of university league tables and research assessment exercises. The need to establish alternate metrics, particularly for the social sciences and humanities, is emphasized, as is an holistic approach to scholarly communication agenda.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)277-290
    Number of pages14
    JournalLearned Publishing
    Volume19
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Oct 2006

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The publishing imperative: The pervasive influence of publication metrics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this