The Qualification to the Birthright Doctrine and Beyond: the Judicial Attitude to Adapting the Common Law to Australian Conditions

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    This article examines the judicial willingness to consider local conditions in developing the common law of Australia. While there were a few notable exceptions, neither colonial judges nor the Privy Council were inclined to adapt English common law rules to Australian conditions despite having scope to do so pursuant to the so-called colonial birthright doctrine. It is highlighted that resistance to examining local conditions in a common law setting persisted for most of the 20th century, as reflected in High Court decisions of the 1970s. However, it is shown that the High Court has been willing to consider Australian-specific factors after the complete abolition of Privy Council appeals. In overturning particular English rules (assumed to be part of the received law), the court has variously reasoned that they were not appropriate to the condition of the Australian colonies or cannot be justified in light of subsequent developments in Australia.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)294-308
    JournalAustralian Law Journal
    Volume94
    Publication statusPublished - 2020

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The Qualification to the Birthright Doctrine and Beyond: the Judicial Attitude to Adapting the Common Law to Australian Conditions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this