THE REDMAPPER GALAXY CLUSTER CATALOG from des SCIENCE VERIFICATION DATA

E S Rykoff, E. Rozo, D. Hollowood, A. Bermeo-Hernandez, T Jeltema, J Mayers, A.K. Romer, P Rooney, A Saro, C Vergara Cervantes, R.H Wechsler, H Wilcox, Michael Childress

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    273 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    We describe updates to the redMaPPer algorithm, a photometric red-sequence cluster finder specifically designed for large photometric surveys. The updated algorithm is applied to $150\;{\mathrm{deg}}^{2}$ of Science Verification (SV) data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES), and to the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) DR8 photometric data set. The DES SV catalog is locally volume limited and contains 786 clusters with richness $\lambda \gt 20$ (roughly equivalent to ${M}_{{\rm{500c}}}\gtrsim {10}^{14}\;{h}_{70}^{-1}\;{M}_{\odot }$) and $0.2\lt z\lt 0.9$. The DR8 catalog consists of 26,311 clusters with $0.08\lt z\lt 0.6$, with a sharply increasing richness threshold as a function of redshift for $z\gtrsim 0.35$. The photometric redshift performance of both catalogs is shown to be excellent, with photometric redshift uncertainties controlled at the ${\sigma }_{z}/(1+z)\sim 0.01$ level for $z\lesssim 0.7$, rising to ∼0.02 at $z\sim 0.9$ in DES SV. We make use of Chandra and XMM X-ray and South Pole Telescope SunyaevZeldovich data to show that the centering performance and massrichness scatter are consistent with expectations based on prior runs of redMaPPer on SDSS data. We also show how the redMaPPer photo-z and richness estimates are relatively insensitive to imperfect star/galaxy separation and small-scale star masks.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article number1
    Pages (from-to)1-19
    JournalAstrophysical Journal, Supplement Series
    Volume224
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2016

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'THE REDMAPPER GALAXY CLUSTER CATALOG from des SCIENCE VERIFICATION DATA'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this