The regulation of civilian drones' impacts on public safety

Roger Clarke*, Lyria Bennett Moses

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    142 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Because they are airborne artefacts, drones embody threats to people and property, even in normal operation, but especially when malfunctions occur in equipment or in the data communications on which they are heavily dependent. Some natural controls exist over inappropriate drone behaviour. General liability laws provide remedies for harm that arises from drones, and act as a deterrent against irresponsible behaviour. Specific air safety laws do, or may, apply to drones. Co-regulatory mechanisms provide protections, as may industry and organisational self-regulation. However, a review of current and emergent regulatory arrangements identifies a considerable range of gaps and uncertainties that need to be addressed, particularly in relation to small drones, including micro-drones.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)263-285
    Number of pages23
    JournalComputer Law and Security Review
    Volume30
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2014

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The regulation of civilian drones' impacts on public safety'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this