Abstract
Because they are airborne artefacts, drones embody threats to people and property, even in normal operation, but especially when malfunctions occur in equipment or in the data communications on which they are heavily dependent. Some natural controls exist over inappropriate drone behaviour. General liability laws provide remedies for harm that arises from drones, and act as a deterrent against irresponsible behaviour. Specific air safety laws do, or may, apply to drones. Co-regulatory mechanisms provide protections, as may industry and organisational self-regulation. However, a review of current and emergent regulatory arrangements identifies a considerable range of gaps and uncertainties that need to be addressed, particularly in relation to small drones, including micro-drones.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 263-285 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Journal | Computer Law and Security Review |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2014 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The regulation of civilian drones' impacts on public safety'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver