The regulation of harm in international trade: A critique of James's Collective Due Care principle

Christian Barry*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    4 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In his important recent book, Aaron James has defended a principle-Collective Due Care-for determining when a form of economic integration is morally objectionable because it causes unjustified harm (including unemployment, wage suppression and diminished working conditions). This essay argues that Collective Due Care would yield implausible judgements about trade practices and would be too indeterminate to play the practical role for which it is intended.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)255-263
    Number of pages9
    JournalCanadian Journal of Philosophy
    Volume44
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2014

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The regulation of harm in international trade: A critique of James's Collective Due Care principle'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this