Abstract
The so-called "Human Nature Constraint" holds that if an agent is unable, due to features of human nature, to bring herself to act in a certain way, then this suffices to block or negate the claim that the agent is required to act in that way. David Estlund (2011) has recently mounted a forceful objection to the Human Nature Constraint. I argue that Estlund’s objection fails – but instructively, in a way that gives Estlund resources for a different way of resisting attempts to negate normative claims by deploying the Human Nature Constraint.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-8 |
| Journal | Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy |
| Volume | 9 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2015 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Relevance of Human Nature'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver