The representation of the national quality framework in the australian print media: silences and slants in the mediatisation of early childhood education policy

Marianne Fenech*, David P. Wilkins

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    11 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    While research investigating the mediatisation of education policy has primarily been undertaken in school contexts, this paper reports on a study conducted in the context of early childhood education. The paper examines how a major policy in early childhood education in Australia–the National Quality Framework–has been mediatised in selected newspapers. Drawing on Foucauldian, critical discourse analysis and mediatisation theorising, we utilised the corpus linguistic tools of WordSmith Tools 6.0 to inform content analyses of 121 articles from two major media corporations, News Corp and Fairfax. Our findings highlight the utility of treating our data as two distinct corpora, with each corporation found to have utilised discursive technologies to proffer competing positionings of the Framework. The contested nature of the Framework–generally purported in Fairfax to be a tool that supports quality early education, as opposed to News Corp’s framing of the policy as one that inhibits affordable childcare–poses implications for which advocacy groups are regarded by the media as having authority and thus likely to influence policy through the reporting of their voices. Implications for newspaper media as a discursive influence on parents’ childcare decision-making are also considered.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)748-770
    Number of pages23
    JournalJournal of Education Policy
    Volume34
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2 Nov 2019

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The representation of the national quality framework in the australian print media: silences and slants in the mediatisation of early childhood education policy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this