Research output per year
Research output per year
Edward Halealoha Ayau, Cressida Fforde, Alan Goodman, Gareth Knapman
Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review
This chapter explores the use of craniometrics in repatriation through in-depth analysis of one case study – the repatriation of ancestral Hawaiian remains house at the Duckworth Laboratory in the University of Cambridge. The case provides insight into the use of craniometrics that occurred within one repatriation claim, revealing also how concepts of legality were influential in the eventual historic decision by the University to return. Beyond the specific context, this chapter raises questions about the utility of craniometrics and the way in which its results are communicated. It charts territory for First Nations presented by craniometric reports that may negatively influence repatriation claims and illustrates how historical research can support archival evidence in ways that do not only rely on finding additional information to increase provenance levels.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Repatriation, Science and Identity |
Editors | Cressida Fforde, Hilary Howes, Gareth Knapman, Lyndon Ormond-Parker |
Place of Publication | Oxon |
Publisher | Routledge |
Chapter | 5 |
Pages | 102-126 |
Edition | 1st |
ISBN (Electronic) | 978-1-000-98517-7, 978-1-003-14495-3 |
ISBN (Print) | 978-0-367-70191-8, 978-0-367-70192-5 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2023 |
Name | Routledge Studies in the Repatriation and Restitution of Human Remains and Cultural Objects |
---|---|
Publisher | Routledge |
Research output: Book/Report › Edited Book › peer-review